Re: [PATCH RFC] target/user: Add double ring buffers support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/13/2017 01:50 AM, Xiubo Li wrote:
There is one new scheme in my mind:

Yes I think it's now clear we need more buffer space to avoid
bottlenecks for high iops. The initial design kept it simple with the
1MB vmalloc'd space but anticipated greater would be needed. It should
not be necessary to change userspace or the TCMU ABI to handle growing
the buffer for fast devices:

1. increase the region mmap()ed by userspace, TCMU_RING_SIZE, from 1MB
to 1GB or larger
For the cmd area, set the size to fixed 512M, and data area's size to
fixed 1G, is that okay ?

512M seems a little big for the cmd area... use of the cmd ring should be much smaller than the data area. Each cmd has a minimum size, but then to describe an additional page in the iovec[] should be just one struct iovec (16 bytes?) for each 4K page.

3. Upgrade the current fixed-size bitmap-based tracking of data area
to handle the new scheme
The Radix tree will be used to keep the block's index(0 ~
1G/DATA_BLOCK_SIZE) and physical page mapping relations. Each leaf is
one data block(the size is DATA_BLOCK_SIZE).

For non-leaf nodes, use the radix tags[0][SLOTs] to indicate wether
slot[SLOTs]'s branch has free(reused the old one or NULL leafs) block
leafs or not.
This could speed the search of the free blocks in data area.

Yes I think radix tree is a good place to start.

Regards -- Andy




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux