On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This seems to be abusing an atomic bitflag as a lock. And I think > in general we have two different things here that this patch conflates: > > a) a lock to protect building and using the reserve lists > b) a flag is a reservations is in use I did have a patch doing exactly that but (appart from lockdep complaints) we decided to drop it, as it made the code even more confusing. -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
