On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:46:00PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Patches 1, 2 and 4 of this series are a real improvement in my opinion. > However, I'm not sure whether patch 3 is the best way to avoid that drivers > have to re-override the transport template timeout handler. Have you > considered to modify the SCSI EH such that the host timeout handler has > priority over the transport timeout handler? I think that would result in > a much smaller patch 3/4. It's not too much of a difference in patch size, and I think it's the cleaner model to only have the method once. However if there is a consensus against this version I can respin a patch that just changes the precendence.
