Re: [PATCH] target: Add WRITE_VERIFY_16 Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 14:49 -0600, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
For clients who want to utilize more than 2GB you need
WRITE AND VERIFY 16 support.
Hello Bryant,

This patch introduces a bug for WRITE AND VERIFY(16) parsing that already
exists for WRITE AND VERIFY(10) parsing, namely that the value of the BYTCHK
field is ignored. Is it OK for you to wait a few weeks with adding WRITE AND
VERIFY(16) support and to come back to this after I have posted my WRITE AND
VERIFY(10) fix?

Bart.

Sounds good, thanks. I'll have to look at your patch sets that fixes that bug.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux