From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] hide EH backup data outside the scsi_cmnd Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:43:26 +0900 > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] hide EH backup data outside the scsi_cmnd > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:43:49 -0500 > > > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 21:19 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > looks like no one but James looked at it as I attached a completely > > > different patch that has been merged long ago. Here's the real one: > > > > And finally, the scsi-target-2.6 tree likewise needs converting. This > > one I'm not sure about, since they appear to need the copy from > > cmnd_data to cmnd which I just killed. Can someone who knows this tree > > look this over? > > Thanks for the patch. > > tgt uses request_bufflen, bufflen, request_buffer, buffer to handle > very large requests (that involves multiple bios). We can add > substitutes into tgt specific data structure (scsi_tgt_cmd structure). > > I sent a patch related with scsi_tgt_cmd structure last week. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=114960851929878&w=2 > > Will this patch be merged? I like to send a new patch on the top of > it. Hi James, The 'update for cmnd field removal' patch got merged but the patch refereed to in this mail did not. Did you just forget or you don't like it? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
