Re: [PATCH] mpt3sas: Force request partial completion alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli
<gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The firmware or device, possibly under a heavy I/O load, can return
> on a partial unaligned boundary. Scsi-ml expects these requests to be
> completed on an alignment boundary. Scsi-ml blindly requeues the I/O
> without checking the alignment boundary of the I/O request for the
> remaining bytes. This leads to errors, since devices cannot perform
> non-aligned read/write operations.
>
> This patch fixes the issue in the driver. It aligns unaligned
> completions of FS requests, by truncating them to the nearest
> alignment boundary.
>
> Reported-by: Mauricio Faria De Oliveira <mauricfo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> index b5c966e..55332a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> @@ -4644,6 +4644,8 @@ _scsih_io_done(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u16 smid, u8 msix_index, u32 reply)
>         struct MPT3SAS_DEVICE *sas_device_priv_data;
>         u32 response_code = 0;
>         unsigned long flags;
> +       unsigned int sector_sz;
> +       struct request *req;
>
>         mpi_reply = mpt3sas_base_get_reply_virt_addr(ioc, reply);
>         scmd = _scsih_scsi_lookup_get_clear(ioc, smid);
> @@ -4703,6 +4705,20 @@ _scsih_io_done(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u16 smid, u8 msix_index, u32 reply)
>         }
>
>         xfer_cnt = le32_to_cpu(mpi_reply->TransferCount);
> +
> +       /* In case of bogus fw or device, we could end up having
> +        * unaligned partial completion. We can force alignment here,
> +        * then scsi-ml does not need to handle this misbehavior.
> +        */
> +       sector_sz = scmd->device->sector_size;
> +       req = scmd->request;
> +       if (unlikely(sector_sz && req && (req->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_FS) &&
> +                   (xfer_cnt % sector_sz))) {
> +               sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd->device,
> +                           "unaligned partial completion avoided\n");

[Sreekanth] Patch looks good. But can we print xfer_cnt & sector_sz
values along with above print.

Also if it is generic drive issue, then can we move this work around
to SCSI Mid Layer?

> +               xfer_cnt = (xfer_cnt / sector_sz) * sector_sz;
> +       }
> +
>         scsi_set_resid(scmd, scsi_bufflen(scmd) - xfer_cnt);
>         if (ioc_status & MPI2_IOCSTATUS_FLAG_LOG_INFO_AVAILABLE)
>                 log_info =  le32_to_cpu(mpi_reply->IOCLogInfo);
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux