On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 08:12:11PM +0530, Chaitra P B wrote:
>> Small glitch/degraded performance in Crusader is improved with SAS
>> drives by removing unnecessary spinlocks while clearing scsi command
>> in drivers internal lookup table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Suganath Prabu S <suganath-prabu.subramani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> Whats wrong with creating a __scsih_scsi_lookup_get_clear() and calling
> it with the scsi_lookup_lock held from _scsih_scsi_lookup_get_clear()
> instead of duplicating the code?
>
> It's quite common in the linux kernel to have two functions func and __func,
> where func is
>
> func()
> {
> spin_lock();
> __func();
> spin_unlock();
> }
>
Sure, We will resend this path with this change.
Thanks,
Sreekanth
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn Storage
> jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
