Re: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU, kernel 2.6.16.20 & 2.6.16-1.2122_FC5[smp]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In-Reply-To: <4491933C.7060100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:05:00 -0700, Konstantin Antselovich wrote:

> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, swapper/0
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  lock: c266f600, .magic: dead4ead, .owner:
> swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 2
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<c01cc02d>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0xd2
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<c02e5bf7>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 _spin_lock_irqsave+0x9/0xd
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201  [<f88b7768>]
> Jun 10 00:57:35 192.168.0.201 ahd_freeze_simq+0x12/0x43 [aic79xx]

Please try 2.6.17.  The spinlock was removed.

-- 
Chuck
 "You can't read a newspaper if you can't read."  --George W. Bush
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux