Re: [PATCH 03/17] lpfc: NVME Initiator: Base modifications Part B

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/18/2017 2:11 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 05:20:46PM -0800, James Smart wrote:
NVME Initiator: Base modifications

This is part B of parts A..F.

Part B is limited to lpfc_attr.c: lpfc attribute modifications

*********

Refer to Part A for a description of base modifications

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]

+	len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len,
+			"%s%d WWPN x%llx WWNN x%llx DID x%06x %s\n",
+			"NVME LPORT lpfc",
Is it the lack of coffee or should it be
			"NVME LPORT lpfc%d WWPN x%llx WWNN x%llx DID x%06x %s\n"

I think you're doing it to not hit the 80 chars limit, but then there are
way more offenders than that one, so...

The line split is certainly due to the 80 limit and have that issue a lot.

As for what the string name should be - I agree with you. something is confused.

+int
+lpfc_emptyq_wait(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct list_head *q, spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(lock);
+	while (!list_empty(q)) {
+		spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+		msleep(20);
+		if (cnt++ > 250) {  /* 5 secs */
+			lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_INIT,
+					"0466 %s %s\n",
+					"Outstanding IO when ",
+					"bringing Adapter offline\n");
+				return 0;
+		}
+		spin_lock_irq(lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
+	return 1;
+}
+
Aren't you using lpc_emptyq_wait() in patches prior to that already? This
breaks git bisect. Pleas test-build (ideally + checkpatch and sparse/smatch)
each patch in the series individually.

I called out - in patch2 - that Patches 2 through 7, known as parts A..F, area really one big patch. They will not follow the git bisect rules. I could have sent them in one huge patch, but chose to break them up. Unfortunately, the mods accumulated over time with lots of reworks - creating a base that was too intertwined to put into small functional patches without spending oodles of time to carve them up. I hope you can bear with me on this set and review the 7 pieces as one big patch.

-- james


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux