On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:21 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:31 -0600, Moore, Eric wrote: > > James said it was okay for having this done in lld, instead > > of transport. I'm sure both me and Andrew would be happy > > the same if the transport handled this. > > Is that possible for you to look into this, or James? > > Before we go the lld route, could someone just assure me this is a > fusion specific problem. Andrew, could you attach the same drives to > another QAS LLD, like aic79xx and verify the problem doesn't recur? We can only reproduce this problem at a specific site which we no longer have access to. At that site, we had problems with both HP OEM'd Maxtor and Fujitsu drives. I also don't have any other u320 cards to try this on other than Fusion. Eric? Have you been able to reproduce this problem on Linux at LSI? > > If it's something drive specific, we probably need more of a blacklist > in the spi transport class. My guess is this is a drive/fusion interaction problem. Andrew - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
