RE: [bug report] scsi: megaraid_sas: Dynamic Raid Map Changes for SAS3.5 Generic Megaraid Controllers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dan,

I will fix the static checker warning

Thanks
sasi

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:09 PM
To: sasikumar.pc@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Tomas Henzl
Cc: megaraidlinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bug report] scsi: megaraid_sas: Dynamic Raid Map Changes for
SAS3.5 Generic Megaraid Controllers

Hello Sasikumar Chandrasekaran,

The patch d889344e4e59: "scsi: megaraid_sas: Dynamic Raid Map Changes for
SAS3.5 Generic Megaraid Controllers" from Jan 10, 2017, leads to the
following static checker warning:

	drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:2043
megasas_build_ldio_fusion()
	warn: curly braces intended?

drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
  2020                  if (instance->is_ventura) {
  2021                          if (io_info.isRead) {
  2022                                  if
((raid->cpuAffinity.pdRead.cpu0) &&
  2023
(raid->cpuAffinity.pdRead.cpu1))
  2024
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2025                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_FCFS;
  2026                                  else if
(raid->cpuAffinity.pdRead.cpu1)
  2027
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2028                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_1;
  2029                                  else
  2030
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2031                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_0;
  2032                          } else {
  2033                          if ((raid->cpuAffinity.pdWrite.cpu0)
  2034                          && (raid->cpuAffinity.pdWrite.cpu1))
  2035
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2036                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_FCFS;
  2037                                  else if
(raid->cpuAffinity.pdWrite.cpu1)
  2038
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2039                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_1;
  2040                                  else
  2041
praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.cpu_sel
  2042                                          = MR_RAID_CTX_CPUSEL_0;
  2043                                  if
(praid_context->raid_context_g35.routing_flags.bits.sld) {
  2044
praid_context->raid_context_g35.raid_flags
  2045                                          =
(MR_RAID_FLAGS_IO_SUB_TYPE_CACHE_BYPASS
  2046                                          <<
MR_RAID_CTX_RAID_FLAGS_IO_SUB_TYPE_SHIFT);
  2047                                  }
  2048                          }
  2049                  }
  2050          } else {

Wow...  You guys are probably already discussed this code, but I'm not on
the linux-scsi list.  Do we have a process issue where we are merging code
that we shouldn't be?  What's going on here?

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux