Re: RFC: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:41:42PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I removed blk-mq on request_fn paths support because it was one of the
> permutations that I felt least useful/stable (see commit c5248f79f3 "dm:
> remove support for stacking dm-mq on .request_fn device(s)")
> 
> As for all of the different IO paths.  I've always liked the idea of
> blk-mq ruling the world.  With Jens' blk-mq IO scheduling advances maybe
> we're closer!

That removed blk-mq on top of request_fn code would do the right thing
for this series if it entirely replaced the old request_fn code in dm-mpath.
(as would the new bio code for that matter)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux