Resending it at as a plain text. From: Chaitanya Kulkarni Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 2:37 PM To: lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [LFS/MM TOPIC][LFS/MM ATTEND]: - Storage Stack and Driver Testing methodology. Hi Folks, I would like to propose a general discussion on Storage stack and device driver testing. Purpose:- ------------- The main objective of this discussion is to address the need for a Unified Test Automation Framework which can be used by different subsystems in the kernel in order to improve the overall development and stability of the storage stack. For Example:- >From my previous experience, I've worked on the NVMe driver testing last year and we have developed simple unit test framework (https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli/tree/master/tests). In current implementation Upstream NVMe Driver supports following subsystems:- 1. PCI Host. 2. RDMA Target. 3. Fiber Channel Target (in progress). Today due to lack of centralized automated test framework NVMe Driver testing is scattered and performed using the combination of various utilities like nvme-cli/tests, nvmet-cli, shell scripts (git://git.infradead.org/nvme-fabrics.git nvmf-selftests) etc. In order to improve overall driver stability with various subsystems, it will be beneficial to have a Unified Test Automation Framework (UTAF) which will centralize overall testing. This topic will allow developers from various subsystem engage in the discussion about how to collaborate efficiently instead of having discussions on lengthy email threads. Participants:- ------------------ I'd like to invite developers from different subsystems to discuss an approach towards a unified testing methodology for storage stack and device drivers belongs to different subsystems. Topics for Discussion:- ------------------------------ As a part of discussion following are some of the key points which we can focus on:- 1. What are the common components of the kernel used by the various subsystems? 2. What are the potential target drivers which can benefit from this approach? (e.g. NVMe, NVMe Over Fabric, Open Channel Solid State Drives etc.) 3. What are the desired features that can be implemented in this Framework? (code coverage, unit tests, stress testings, regression, generating Coccinelle reports etc.) 4. Desirable Report generation mechanism? 5. Basic performance validation? 6. Whether QEMU can be used to emulate some of the H/W functionality to create a test platform? (Optional subsystem specific) Some background about myself I'm Chaitanya Kulkarni, I worked as a team lead which was responsible for delivering scalable multiplatform Automated Test Framework for device drivers testing at HGST. It's been used for more than 1 year on Linux/Windows for unit testing/regression/performance validation of the NVMe Linux and Windows driver successfully. I've also recently started contributing to the NVMe Host and NVMe over Fabrics Target driver. Regards, -Chaitanya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
