>>>>> "Souptick" == Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Souptick, Sorry about the delay. Been out for a few days. >>> Inside mvs_task_prep(), pci_pool_alloc() followed by memset will be >>> replaced by pci_pool_zalloc() Souptick> Any further comment on this ? I took one of your other patches because the driver maintainer acked it, thus assuming responsibility for testing it and fixing any regressions it may cause. The failure rate on these "trivial" patches to old and unmaintained drivers is very high. And since you are not fixing any bugs and your change is functionally identical what the code already does, why would we merge it and risk a regression? (for changes like this, a Tested-by: from somebody with actual hardware is worth a thousand Reviewed-by: tags). Also, I'm not really convinced that this constant churn of new and "improved" kernel interface helper functions is really solving anything. Quite the contrary. Real bug fixes for drivers adopting the pci_pool_zalloc() interface will now potentially be harder to backport to stable releases predating 4.4 or whenever that call was introduced. So in summary, I don't see any actual benefits to your proposed change. It's probably fine, but why would I risk merging it? Hope that all makes sense... Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
