Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] scsi: ufs: add trace event for ufs commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-12-13 12:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:52:16 -0800
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Lee Susman <lsusman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Use the ftrace infrastructure to conditionally trace ufs command events. New trace event is created, which samples the following ufs command data:
- device name
- optional identification string
- task tag
- doorbell register
- number of transfer bytes
- interrupt status register
- request start LBA
- command opcode

Currently we only fully trace read(10) and write(10) commands.
All other commands which pass through ufshcd_send_command() will be
printed with "-1" in the lba and transfer_len fields.

Usage:
	echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/ufs/enable
	cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe

Signed-off-by: Lee Susman <lsusman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/trace/events/ufs.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 33f3947..926d1ef 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -301,6 +301,51 @@ static inline void ufshcd_remove_non_printable(char *val)
 		*val = ' ';
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
+static void ufshcd_add_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+		unsigned int tag, const char *str)

Is this function only to use if you enable the tracepoint? Is there
anything here doing something that wouldn't be enabled if tracing
wasn't configured in?

Also, if this is in a code execution path, it appears that you do this
work regardless if the tracer is running or not.

That's true, need to fix this.


+{
+	sector_t lba = -1;
+	u8 opcode = 0;
+	u32 intr, doorbell;
+	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
+	int transfer_len = -1;
+
+	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
+
+	if (lrbp->cmd) { /* data phase exists */
+		opcode = (u8)(*lrbp->cmd->cmnd);
+		if ((opcode == READ_10) || (opcode == WRITE_10)) {
+			/*
+			 * Currently we only fully trace read(10) and write(10)
+			 * commands
+			 */
+			if (lrbp->cmd->request && lrbp->cmd->request->bio)
+				lba =
+				  lrbp->cmd->request->bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
+			transfer_len = be32_to_cpu(
+				lrbp->ucd_req_ptr->sc.exp_data_transfer_len);
+		}
+	}
+
+	intr = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+	doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
+	trace_ufshcd_command(dev_name(hba->dev), str, tag,
+				doorbell, transfer_len, intr, lba, opcode);
+}
+
+static inline void ufshcd_cond_add_cmd_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+					unsigned int tag, const char *str)
+{
+	ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, tag, str);
+}
+#else
+static inline void ufshcd_cond_add_cmd_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+					unsigned int tag, const char *str)
+{
+}
+#endif

If my above assumptions are correct, I recommend removing the above
#if, and have it always configured. Then...

Agreed.


+
 static void ufshcd_print_host_regs(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1193,6 +1238,7 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
 	ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << task_tag, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
 	/* Make sure that doorbell is committed immediately */
 	wmb();

Add:

	if (trace_ufshcd_command_enabled())
		ufshcd_cond_add_cmd_trace(hba, task_tag, "send");

For one thing, the function only gets called if the tracepoint
ufshcd_command is enabled.

Now if CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS is not configured in, then the
trace_ufshcd_command_enabled() turns into a "return false;" which one
would hope that gcc will take that as a if (0) and optimized the entire
function out of existence.

This would make the code a bit cleaner and accomplish the same.

Agreed, will try this. Thank you.


-- Steve


 }

 /**
@@ -3982,6 +4028,7 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 		lrbp = &hba->lrb[index];
 		cmd = lrbp->cmd;
 		if (cmd) {
+			ufshcd_cond_add_cmd_trace(hba, index, "complete");
 			result = ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(hba, lrbp);
 			scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
 			cmd->result = result;
@@ -3993,8 +4040,11 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 			__ufshcd_release(hba);
 		} else if (lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE ||
 			lrbp->command_type == UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE) {
-			if (hba->dev_cmd.complete)
+			if (hba->dev_cmd.complete) {
+				ufshcd_cond_add_cmd_trace(hba, index,
+						"dev_complete");
 				complete(hba->dev_cmd.complete);
+			}
 		}
 	}

diff --git a/include/trace/events/ufs.h b/include/trace/events/ufs.h
index 8bce504..d0ed0cf 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ufs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ufs.h
@@ -183,6 +183,44 @@
 	     TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, int err, s64 usecs,
 		      const char *dev_state, const char *link_state),
 	     TP_ARGS(dev_name, err, usecs, dev_state, link_state));
+
+TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_command,
+	TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, const char *str, unsigned int tag,
+			u32 doorbell, int transfer_len, u32 intr, u64 lba,
+			u8 opcode),
+
+ TP_ARGS(dev_name, str, tag, doorbell, transfer_len, intr, lba, opcode),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__string(dev_name, dev_name)
+		__string(str, str)
+		__field(unsigned int, tag)
+		__field(u32, doorbell)
+		__field(int, transfer_len)
+		__field(u32, intr)
+		__field(u64, lba)
+		__field(u8, opcode)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__assign_str(dev_name, dev_name);
+		__assign_str(str, str);
+		__entry->tag = tag;
+		__entry->doorbell = doorbell;
+		__entry->transfer_len = transfer_len;
+		__entry->intr = intr;
+		__entry->lba = lba;
+		__entry->opcode = opcode;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk(
+ "%s: %s: tag: %u, DB: 0x%x, size: %d, IS: %u, LBA: %llu, opcode: 0x%x",
+		__get_str(str), __get_str(dev_name), __entry->tag,
+		__entry->doorbell, __entry->transfer_len,
+		__entry->intr, __entry->lba, (u32)__entry->opcode
+	)
+);
+
#endif /* if !defined(_TRACE_UFS_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) */

 /* This part must be outside protection */

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux