Hi Hannes,
On 12/7/16, 3:32 AM, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>This is a bit odd.
>If you already have code for fixing the to-do, why is the to-do there?
>And if the code doesn't work, what's the point of including it here?
>
>I would suggest removing the code; the comment should be giving enough
>of a hint of what needs to be implemented.
Thanks for the review comments. This is one looks like got left off.
We’ll fix this code and resubmit this series.
Thanks,
- Himanshu
>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
