Thanks for the response, Martin. On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, 8:45am, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Arun" == Arun Easi <arun.easi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Arun, > > Arun> So far, we have been posting qedi changes split into functional > Arun> blocks, for review, but was not bisectable. With Martin ok to our > Arun> request to squash all patches while committing to tree, we were > Arun> wondering if we should post the qedi patches squashed, with all > Arun> the Reviewed-by added, or continue to post as before? > > I guess it depends how things can be split up in a bisectable fashion. These were the patches that was sent: 1 qed: Add support for hardware offloaded iSCSI. 2 qed: Add iSCSI out of order packet handling. 3 qedi: Add QLogic FastLinQ offload iSCSI driver framework. 4 qedi: Add LL2 iSCSI interface for offload iSCSI. 5 qedi: Add support for iSCSI session management. 6 qedi: Add support for data path. > > If the net/ pieces can be completely separated from the scsi/ pieces > maybe it would be best to have two patches? > Yes, those pieces can be completely separated; there are actually 3 parts, 2 that goes to net/ and 1 to scsi/. In the list above, 1 & 2 goes to net/ and are bisectable. 3 through 6 are scsi/ pieces, which are the ones requested for collapsing. We will post these pieces for V3, then: 1 [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] qed: Add support for hardware offloaded iSCSI. 2 [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] qed: Add iSCSI out of order packet handling. 3 [PATCH v3 3/3] qedi: Add QLogic FastLinQ offload iSCSI driver framework. Regards, -Arun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
