On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:13:12PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > This is what /proc/interrupts looks like after booting from the lpfc HBA, > with your patches: > > ettrick:~ # grep lpfc /proc/interrupts > 44: 2056 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 5242880-edge lpfc > 46: 2186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 5244928-edge lpfc > 48: 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 6815744-edge lpfc:sp > 49: 2060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 6815745-edge lpfc:fp > 51: 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 6817792-edge lpfc:sp > 52: 1074 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 6817793-edge lpfc:fp > ettrick:~ # for irq in 44 46 48 49 51 52; do echo -n "$irq: "; \ > > cat /proc/irq/$irq/smp_affinity; done > 44: 55555555 > 46: 55555555 > 48: 55555555 > 49: 55555555 > 51: 55555555 > 52: 55555555 > ettrick:~ # > > Anything else you want me to look at? Looks like you have non SLI-4 devices, which doesn't support multiple queues, so patch 2 shouldn't have made a difference anyway. But even with an SLI-4 device we'd need some actual I/O from different CPUs to it to see how the interrupts were spread. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
