Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh_rdac: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/2016 03:47 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Switch to using scsi_execute_req_flags() instead of using the
block primitives.

__scsi_execute adds RQF_QUIET and RQF_PREEMPT to the request flags, which
would be a change in behavior.  A little analysis on why that's safe or
even desireable would be nice.  (This also applies to the other two patches
I think).

Hmm. Yeah, guess I'll need to reconcile that.


 static void release_controller(struct kref *kref)
 static int get_lun_info(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct rdac_dh_data *h,
 			char *array_name, u8 *array_id)
 {
+	int err = SCSI_DH_IO, i;
 	struct c8_inquiry *inqp;

+	if (!scsi_get_vpd_page(sdev, 0xC8, (unsigned char *)h,
+			       sizeof(struct c8_inquiry))) {

This looks completely bogus to me - h is a struct rdac_dh_data pointer,
which is an in-kernel data structure that scsi_get_vpd_page would
scramble over.

Indeed, you are right. I'll be fixing it up.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux