Re: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: fix wrong scsi_device_put() in alua_rtpg_queue()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2016 01:21 AM, tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: "tang.junhui" <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> scsi_device_put() is called when the conditions pg->rtpg_sdev!=NULL
> and queue_delayed_work() failure satisfied, actually it should be not
> to call because scsi_device_get() is not called previous in this scene.
> 
> Signed-off-by: tang.junhui <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 241829e..78081df 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> @@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>  			    struct alua_queue_data *qdata, bool force)
>  {
>  	int start_queue = 0;
> +	int sdev_geted = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *alua_wq = kaluad_wq;
>  
> @@ -884,6 +885,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>  		kref_get(&pg->kref);
>  		pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
>  		scsi_device_get(sdev);
> +		sdev_geted = 1;
>  		start_queue = 1;
>  	} else if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG) && force) {
>  		pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
> @@ -901,7 +903,8 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>  	if (start_queue &&
>  	    !queue_delayed_work(alua_wq, &pg->rtpg_work,
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(ALUA_RTPG_DELAY_MSECS))) {
> -		scsi_device_put(sdev);
> +		if (sdev_geted)
> +			scsi_device_put(sdev);
>  		kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
>  	}
>  }

Hello Tang Junhui,

Personally I prefer the patch below because that patch does not introduce
a new variable. This is a patch I started testing four weeks ago and it has
survived all my ALUA tests so far. Please note that I do not know whether
my tests hit the !(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUNNING) code path.

From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:06:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: Fix a reference counting bug

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
index 241829e..23835f7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
@@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
 		/* Do not queue if the worker is already running */
 		if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUNNING)) {
 			kref_get(&pg->kref);
+			sdev = NULL;
 			start_queue = 1;
 		}
 	}
@@ -901,7 +902,8 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
 	if (start_queue &&
 	    !queue_delayed_work(alua_wq, &pg->rtpg_work,
 				msecs_to_jiffies(ALUA_RTPG_DELAY_MSECS))) {
-		scsi_device_put(sdev);
+		if (sdev)
+			scsi_device_put(sdev);
 		kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.10.1


 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux