On 10/25/2016 1:28 AM, TomK wrote:
On 10/24/2016 2:36 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi TomK,
Thanks for reporting this bug. Comments inline below.
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 00:45 -0400, TomK wrote:
On 10/24/2016 12:32 AM, TomK wrote:
On 10/23/2016 10:03 PM, TomK wrote:
Hey,
Has anyone seen this and could have a workaround? Seems like it is
more
Kernel related with various apps not just target apparently not but
wondering if there is an interim solution
(https://access.redhat.com/solutions/408833)
Getting this message after few minutes of usage from the QLA2xxx
driver.
This is after some activity on an ESXi server (15 VM's) that I'm
connecting to this HBA. I've tried the following tuning parameters
but
there was no change in behaviour:
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 5
vm.dirty_ratio = 10
Details:
Oct 23 21:28:25 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 21:28:29 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Found referenced qla2xxx
task_tag: 1128612
Oct 23 21:28:42 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Sending
TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE for ref_tag: 1128612
Oct 23 21:28:42 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Found referenced qla2xxx
task_tag: 1129116
You are likely hitting a known v4.1+ regression, not yet merged up to
v4.8.y code:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/527268df31e57cf2b6d417198717c6d6afdb1e3e
Jan 6 23:52:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 21:30:18 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 6 23:54:01 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 21:32:16 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:289
blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/u16:8 D
ffff88011113ba18 0
289 2 0x00000000
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: tmr-fileio target_tmr_work
[target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88011113ba18 0000000000000400
ffff880049e926c0 ffff88011113b998
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880111134600 ffffffff81f99ca0
ffffffff81f998ef ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff812f27d9 0000000000000000
ffffe8ffffc9a000 ffff880000000000
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812f27d9>] ?
number+0x2e9/0x310
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>]
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080169>] ?
start_flush_work+0x49/0x180
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810802ba>] ?
flush_work+0x1a/0x40
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bd15c>] ?
console_unlock+0x35c/0x380
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6f84>]
__transport_wait_for_tasks+0xb4/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bdd1f>] ?
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8115cc5c>] ?
printk+0x46/0x48
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f70c4>]
transport_wait_for_tasks+0x44/0x60 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f46e2>]
core_tmr_abort_task+0xf2/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6aa4>]
target_tmr_work+0x154/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080639>]
process_one_work+0x189/0x4e0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/1:48:6089
blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/1:48 D
ffff88004017f968 0
6089 2 0x00000080
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: events
qlt_free_session_done
[qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88004017f968 ffff88004017f8f8
ffff88011a83a300 0000000000000004
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88004017a600 ffff88004017f938
ffffffff810a0bb6 ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880110fd0840 ffff880000000000
ffffffff81090728 ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a0bb6>] ?
enqueue_task_fair+0x66/0x410
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81090728>] ?
check_preempt_curr+0x78/0x90
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109075d>] ?
ttwu_do_wakeup+0x1d/0xf0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>]
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81090de0>] ?
ttwu_queue+0x180/0x190
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f76ad>]
target_wait_for_sess_cmds+0x4d/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa00e7188>] ?
qla2x00_post_work+0x58/0x70 [qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa0286f69>]
tcm_qla2xxx_free_session+0x49/0x90 [tcm_qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa01447e9>]
qlt_free_session_done+0xf9/0x3d0 [qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff815092fc>] ?
dbs_work_handler+0x5c/0x90
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8107f960>] ?
pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x50/0xa0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080639>]
process_one_work+0x189/0x4e0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810d060c>] ?
del_timer_sync+0x4c/0x60
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108131e>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x8e/0x110
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 23 21:32:24 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Jan 6 23:56:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 21:34:22 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 21:34:22 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 3 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:289
blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/u16:8 D
ffff88011113ba18 0
289 2 0x00000000
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: tmr-fileio target_tmr_work
[target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88011113ba18 0000000000000400
ffff880049e926c0 ffff88011113b998
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880111134600 ffffffff81f99ca0
ffffffff81f998ef ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff812f27d9 0000000000000000
ffffe8ffffc9a000 ffff880000000000
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812f27d9>] ?
number+0x2e9/0x310
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>]
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080169>] ?
start_flush_work+0x49/0x180
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810802ba>] ?
flush_work+0x1a/0x40
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bd15c>] ?
console_unlock+0x35c/0x380
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6f84>]
__transport_wait_for_tasks+0xb4/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bdd1f>] ?
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8115cc5c>] ?
printk+0x46/0x48
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f70c4>]
transport_wait_for_tasks+0x44/0x60 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f46e2>]
core_tmr_abort_task+0xf2/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6aa4>]
target_tmr_work+0x154/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080639>]
process_one_work+0x189/0x4e0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/1:48:6089
blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/1:48 D
ffff88004017f968 0
6089 2 0x00000080
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: events
qlt_free_session_done
[qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88004017f968 ffff88004017f8f8
ffff88011a83a300 0000000000000004
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88004017a600 ffff88004017f938
ffffffff810a0bb6 ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880110fd0840 ffff880000000000
ffffffff81090728 ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a0bb6>] ?
enqueue_task_fair+0x66/0x410
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81090728>] ?
check_preempt_curr+0x78/0x90
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109075d>] ?
ttwu_do_wakeup+0x1d/0xf0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>]
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81090de0>] ?
ttwu_queue+0x180/0x190
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f76ad>]
target_wait_for_sess_cmds+0x4d/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa00e7188>] ?
qla2x00_post_work+0x58/0x70 [qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa0286f69>]
tcm_qla2xxx_free_session+0x49/0x90 [tcm_qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa01447e9>]
qlt_free_session_done+0xf9/0x3d0 [qla2xxx]
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff815092fc>] ?
dbs_work_handler+0x5c/0x90
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8107f960>] ?
pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x50/0xa0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080639>]
process_one_work+0x189/0x4e0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810d060c>] ?
del_timer_sync+0x4c/0x60
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108131e>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x8e/0x110
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 23 21:34:27 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 23 21:36:04 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 21:36:04 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 3 rtc interrupts
Jan 6 23:58:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:289
blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/u16:8 D
ffff88011113ba18 0
289 2 0x00000000
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: tmr-fileio target_tmr_work
[target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88011113ba18 0000000000000400
ffff880049e926c0 ffff88011113b998
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880111134600 ffffffff81f99ca0
ffffffff81f998ef ffff880100000000
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff812f27d9 0000000000000000
ffffe8ffffc9a000 ffff880000000000
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812f27d9>] ?
number+0x2e9/0x310
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>]
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080169>] ?
start_flush_work+0x49/0x180
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810802ba>] ?
flush_work+0x1a/0x40
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bd15c>] ?
console_unlock+0x35c/0x380
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6f84>]
__transport_wait_for_tasks+0xb4/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 21:36:30 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bdd1f>] ?
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
Including the full log:
http://microdevsys.com/linux-lio/messages-mailing-list
Thanks for posting with qla2xxx verbose debug enabled on your setup.
When tryint to shut down target using /etc/init.d/target stop, the
following is printed repeatedly:
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e837:20:
ABTS_RECV_24XX: instance 0
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-f811:20:
qla_target(0): task abort (s_id=1:5:0, tag=1177068, param=0)
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-f812:20:
qla_target(0): task abort for non-existant session
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-f80e:20:
Scheduling work (type 1, prm ffff880093365680) to find session for param
ffff88010f8c7680 (size 64, tgt ffff880111f06600)
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-f800:20: Sess
work (tgt ffff880111f06600)
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e806:20: Sending
task mgmt ABTS response (ha=ffff88010fae0000, atio=ffff880093365694,
status=4
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e838:20:
ABTS_RESP_24XX: compl_status 31
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e807:20: Sending
retry TERM EXCH CTIO7 (ha=ffff88010fae0000)
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e806:20: Sending
task mgmt ABTS response (ha=ffff88010fae0000, atio=ffff88010f8c76c0,
status=0
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e838:20:
ABTS_RESP_24XX: compl_status 0
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e872:20:
qlt_24xx_atio_pkt_all_vps: qla_target(0): type 6 ox_id 029c
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-3861:20: New
command while device ffff880111f06600 is shutting down
Oct 24 00:39:48 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-e859:20:
qla_target: Unable to send command to target for req, ignoring.
At your earliest convenience, please verify the patch using v4.8.y with
the above ABORT_TASK + shutdown scenario.
Also, it would be helpful to understand why this ESX FC host is
generating ABORT_TASKs.
Eg: Is ABORT_TASK generated due to FC target response packet loss..?
Or due to target backend I/O latency, that ultimately triggers FC host
side timeouts...?
+ when I disable the ports on the brocade switch that we're using then
try to stop target, the following is printed:
Oct 24 00:41:31 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.1]-680a:21: Loop
down - seconds remaining 231.
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-680a:20: Loop
down - seconds remaining 153.
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 8615 at
lib/list_debug.c:33 __list_add+0xbe/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: list_add corruption. prev->next should
be next (ffff88009e83b330), but was ffff88011fc972a0.
(prev=ffff880118ada4c0).
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Modules linked in: tcm_qla2xxx tcm_fc
tcm_loop target_core_file target_core_iblock target_core_pscsi
target_core_mod configfs ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables
nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_CHECKSUM
iptable_mangle bridge nfsd lockd grace nfs_acl auth_rpcgss autofs4 it87
hwmon_vid bnx2fc cnic uio fcoe libfcoe libfc 8021q garp stp llc ppdev
parport_pc parport sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand bonding ipv6 crc_ccitt
ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_multiport iptable_filter ip_tables fuse
vfat fat xfs vhost_net macvtap macvlan vhost tun uinput raid456
async_raid6_recov async_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx raid6_pq
libcrc32c joydev sg serio_raw e1000 kvm_amd kvm irqbypass r8169 mii
pcspkr k10temp snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel
snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm
snd_timer snd soundcore i2c_piix4 i2c_core wmi acpi_cpufreq shpchp ext4
mbcache jbd2 qla2xxx scsi_transport_fc floppy firewire_ohci f
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: irewire_core crc_itu_t sd_mod pata_acpi
ata_generic pata_jmicron ahci libahci usb_storage dm_mirror
dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 8615 Comm: kworker/2:3 Not
tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co.,
Ltd. GA-890XA-UD3/GA-890XA-UD3, BIOS FC 08/02/2010
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: 0000000000000000 ffff880092b83b48
ffffffff812e88e9 ffffffff8130753e
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880092b83ba8 ffff880092b83ba8
0000000000000000 ffff880092b83b98
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff81066a7d ffff88000058f952
0000002100000046 ffffffff8101eae8
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812e88e9>]
dump_stack+0x51/0x78
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8130753e>] ?
__list_add+0xbe/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81066a7d>] __warn+0xfd/0x120
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8101eae8>] ?
__switch_to+0x398/0x7e0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81066b59>]
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x49/0x50
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8130753e>]
__list_add+0xbe/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8107d0b2>]
move_linked_works+0x62/0x90
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108070c>]
process_one_work+0x25c/0x4e0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162bb3d>] ?
__schedule+0x2fd/0x6a0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ---[ end trace 713a9071c9f5f464 ]---
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 8615 at
lib/list_debug.c:36 __list_add+0x9c/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: list_add double add:
new=ffff880118ada4c0, prev=ffff880118ada4c0, next=ffff88009e83b330.
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Modules linked in: tcm_qla2xxx tcm_fc
tcm_loop target_core_file target_core_iblock target_core_pscsi
target_core_mod configfs ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables
nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_CHECKSUM
iptable_mangle bridge nfsd lockd grace nfs_acl auth_rpcgss autofs4 it87
hwmon_vid bnx2fc cnic uio fcoe libfcoe libfc 8021q garp stp llc ppdev
parport_pc parport sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand bonding ipv6 crc_ccitt
ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_multiport iptable_filter ip_tables fuse
vfat fat xfs vhost_net macvtap macvlan vhost tun uinput raid456
async_raid6_recov async_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx raid6_pq
libcrc32c joydev sg serio_raw e1000 kvm_amd kvm irqbypass r8169 mii
pcspkr k10temp snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel
snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm
snd_timer snd soundcore i2c_piix4 i2c_core wmi acpi_cpufreq shpchp ext4
mbcache jbd2 qla2xxx scsi_transport_fc floppy firewire_ohci f
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: irewire_core crc_itu_t sd_mod pata_acpi
ata_generic pata_jmicron ahci libahci usb_storage dm_mirror
dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 8615 Comm: kworker/2:3
Tainted: G W 4.8.4 #2
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co.,
Ltd. GA-890XA-UD3/GA-890XA-UD3, BIOS FC 08/02/2010
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: 0000000000000000 ffff880092b83b48
ffffffff812e88e9 ffffffff8130751c
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880092b83ba8 ffff880092b83ba8
0000000000000000 ffff880092b83b98
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff81066a7d ffff88000058f952
0000002400000046 ffffffff8101eae8
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812e88e9>]
dump_stack+0x51/0x78
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8130751c>] ?
__list_add+0x9c/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81066a7d>] __warn+0xfd/0x120
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8101eae8>] ?
__switch_to+0x398/0x7e0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81066b59>]
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x49/0x50
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8130751c>]
__list_add+0x9c/0xd0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8107d0b2>]
move_linked_works+0x62/0x90
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108070c>]
process_one_work+0x25c/0x4e0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162bb3d>] ?
__schedule+0x2fd/0x6a0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ?
schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: ---[ end trace 713a9071c9f5f465 ]---
Oct 24 00:41:32 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.1]-680a:21: Loop
down - seconds remaining 230.
Oct 24 00:41:33 mbpc-pc kernel: qla2xxx [0000:04:00.0]-680a:20: Loop
down - seconds remaining 152.
Mmmm. Could be a side effect of the target-core regression, but not
completely sure..
Adding QLOGIC folks CC'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hey Nicholas,
At your earliest convenience, please verify the patch using v4.8.y with
the above ABORT_TASK + shutdown scenario.
Also, it would be helpful to understand why this ESX FC host is
generating ABORT_TASKs.
Eg: Is ABORT_TASK generated due to FC target response packet loss..?
Or due to target backend I/O latency, that ultimately triggers FC host
side timeouts...?
Here is where it gets interesting and to your thought above. Take for
example this log snippet
(http://microdevsys.com/linux-lio/messages-recent):
Oct 23 22:12:51 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 7 00:36:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 22:14:14 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9599 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:14:14 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:15:02 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:15:41 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 7 00:38:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 22:16:29 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9599 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:17:30 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 7 00:40:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 22:18:29 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Found referenced qla2xxx
task_tag: 1195032
Oct 23 22:18:33 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:18:42 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Sending
TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE for ref_tag: 1195032
Oct 23 22:18:42 mbpc-pc kernel: ABORT_TASK: Found referenced qla2xxx
task_tag: 1122276
Oct 23 22:19:35 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 7 00:42:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 22:20:41 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:308 blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: Not tainted 4.8.4 #2
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: kworker/u16:8 D ffff880111b8fa18 0
308 2 0x00000000
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: Workqueue: tmr-fileio target_tmr_work
[target_core_mod]
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff880111b8fa18 0000000000000400
ffff880112180480 ffff880111b8f998
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: ffff88011107a380 ffffffff81f99ca0
ffffffff81f998ef ffff880100000000
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: ffffffff812f27d9 0000000000000000
ffffe8ffffcda000 ffff880000000000
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff812f27d9>] ? number+0x2e9/0x310
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080169>] ?
start_flush_work+0x49/0x180
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162e7ec>]
schedule_timeout+0x9c/0xe0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810802ba>] ? flush_work+0x1a/0x40
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bd15c>] ?
console_unlock+0x35c/0x380
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162cfa0>]
wait_for_completion+0xc0/0xf0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923e0>] ?
try_to_wake_up+0x260/0x260
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6f84>]
__transport_wait_for_tasks+0xb4/0x1b0 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810bdd1f>] ?
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8115cc5c>] ? printk+0x46/0x48
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f70c4>]
transport_wait_for_tasks+0x44/0x60 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f46e2>]
core_tmr_abort_task+0xf2/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffffa08f6aa4>]
target_tmr_work+0x154/0x160 [target_core_mod]
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81080639>]
process_one_work+0x189/0x4e0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810d060c>] ?
del_timer_sync+0x4c/0x60
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108131e>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x8e/0x110
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8108150d>]
worker_thread+0x16d/0x520
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810923f2>] ?
default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810a6f06>] ?
__wake_up_common+0x56/0x90
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162c040>] ? schedule+0x40/0xb0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff810813a0>] ?
maybe_create_worker+0x110/0x110
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085fec>] kthread+0xcc/0xf0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8109130e>] ?
schedule_tail+0x1e/0xc0
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff8162f60f>]
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
Oct 23 22:21:07 mbpc-pc kernel: [<ffffffff81085f20>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Oct 23 22:21:52 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
Jan 7 00:44:00 192.168.0.2 syslog: dhcpfwd : dhcp forwarder daemon
successfully started
Oct 23 22:23:03 mbpc-pc kernel: hpet1: lost 9600 rtc interrupts
And compare it to the following snippet
(http://microdevsys.com/linux-lio/iostat-tkx-interesting-bit.txt) taken
from this bigger iostat session
(http://microdevsys.com/linux-lio/iostat-tkx.txt):
10/23/2016 10:18:19 PM
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.25 0.00 0.50 15.83 0.00 83.42
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 80.00 0.00
80.00 0.02 12.00 12.00 2.40
sdc 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 64.00 0.00
128.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.20
sdd 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 48.00 0.00
96.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sde 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 64.00 0.00
64.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.30
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 60.10
sdg 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 20.00
13.33 0.03 10.00 10.00 3.00
sda 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 64.00 0.00
64.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.40
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fd0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 20.00
8.00 0.03 6.40 6.00 3.00
dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
md0 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 384.00 0.00
256.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-6 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 384.00 0.00
256.00 0.60 1.33 201.67 60.50
10/23/2016 10:18:20 PM
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 0.25 25.19 0.00 74.56
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.50
5.00 0.03 27.00 27.00 2.70
sdc 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.50
5.00 0.01 15.00 15.00 1.50
sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.50
5.00 0.02 18.00 18.00 1.80
sde 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.50
5.00 0.02 23.00 23.00 2.30
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.15 0.00 0.00 100.00
sdg 0.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 172.00
70.40 0.04 8.40 2.80 1.40
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.50
5.00 0.04 37.00 37.00 3.70
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fd0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-0 0.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 4.00 172.00
50.29 0.05 7.29 2.00 1.40
dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
10/23/2016 10:18:21 PM
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 0.25 24.81 0.00 74.94
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdc 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sde 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
sdg 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fd0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
dm-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
We can see that /dev/sdf ramps up to 100% starting at around (10/23/2016
10:18:18 PM) and stays that way till about the (10/23/2016 10:18:42 PM)
mark when something occurs and it drops down to below 100% numbers.
So I checked the array which shows all clean, even across reboots:
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sdb[7] sdf[6] sdd[3] sda[5] sdc[1] sde[8]
3907045632 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6]
[UUUUUU]
bitmap: 1/8 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
[root@mbpc-pc ~]#
Then I run smartctl across all disks and sure enough /dev/sdf prints this:
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# smartctl -A /dev/sdf
smartctl 5.43 2012-06-30 r3573 [x86_64-linux-4.8.4] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-12 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
Error SMART Values Read failed: scsi error badly formed scsi parameters
Smartctl: SMART Read Values failed.
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
[root@mbpc-pc ~]#
So it would appear we found the root cause, a bad disk. True the disk
is bad and I'll be replacing it however, even with a degraded disk
(checking now) the array functions just fine and I have no data loss. I
only lost 1. I would have to loose 3 to get a catastrophic failure on
this RAID6:
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sdf[6](F) sda[5] sde[8] sdb[7] sdd[3] sdc[1]
3907045632 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/5]
[UUUU_U]
bitmap: 6/8 pages [24KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Mon Mar 26 00:06:24 2012
Raid Level : raid6
Array Size : 3907045632 (3726.05 GiB 4000.81 GB)
Used Dev Size : 976761408 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Tue Oct 25 00:31:13 2016
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 1
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Name : mbpc:0
UUID : 2f36ac48:5e3e4c54:72177c53:bea3e41e
Events : 118368
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
8 8 64 0 active sync /dev/sde
1 8 32 1 active sync /dev/sdc
7 8 16 2 active sync /dev/sdb
3 8 48 3 active sync /dev/sdd
8 0 0 8 removed
5 8 0 5 active sync /dev/sda
6 8 80 - faulty /dev/sdf
[root@mbpc-pc ~]#
Last night I cut power to the /dev/sdf disk to spin it down the removed
it and reinserted it. The array resynced without issue however the
smartctl -A command still failed on it. Today I check and bad blocks
were recorded on the disk and the array has since removed /dev/sdf (per
above). Also I have to say that these ESXi hosts worked in this
configuration, without any hickup, for about 4 months. No LUN failure
on the ESXi side. I haven't changed the LUN in that time (had no reason
to do so).
So now here's the real question that I have. Why would the array
continue to function, as intended, with only one disk failure yet the
QLogic / Target drivers stop and error out? The RAID6 (software) array
should care about the failure, and it should handle it. QLogic / Target
Drivers shouldn't really be too impacted (aside from read speed maybe)
about a disk failing inside the array. That would be my thinking. The
Target / QLogic software seems to have picked up on a failure ahead of
the software RAID 6 detecting it. I've had this RAID6 for over 6 years
now. Aside from the occassional disk replacement, quite rock solid.
So anyway, I added the fix you pointed out to the 4.8.4 kernel and
recompiled. I restarted it, with the RAID6 degraded as it is. All
mounted fine and I checked the LUN's from the ESXi side:
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# /etc/init.d/target start
The Linux SCSI Target is already stopped [ OK ]
[info] The Linux SCSI Target looks properly installed.
The configfs filesystem was not mounted, consider adding it[WARNING]
[info] Loaded core module target_core_mod.
[info] Loaded core module target_core_pscsi.
[info] Loaded core module target_core_iblock.
[info] Loaded core module target_core_file.
Failed to load fabric module ib_srpt [WARNING]
Failed to load fabric module tcm_usb_gadget [WARNING]
[info] Loaded fabric module tcm_loop.
[info] Loaded fabric module tcm_fc.
Failed to load fabric module vhost_scsi [WARNING]
[info] Loaded fabric module tcm_qla2xxx.
Failed to load fabric module iscsi_target_mod [WARNING]
[info] Loading config from /etc/target/scsi_target.lio, this may take
several minutes for FC adapters.
[info] Loaded /etc/target/scsi_target.lio.
Started The Linux SCSI Target [ OK ]
[root@mbpc-pc ~]#
Enabled the brocade ports:
18 18 011200 id N4 No_Light FC
19 19 011300 id N4 No_Sync FC Disabled (Persistent)
20 20 011400 id N4 No_Light FC
21 21 011500 id N4 No_Light FC
22 22 011600 id N4 No_Light FC
23 23 011700 id N4 No_Light FC Disabled (Persistent)
24 24 011800 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
25 25 011900 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
26 26 011a00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
27 27 011b00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
28 28 011c00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
29 29 011d00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
30 30 011e00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
31 31 011f00 -- N4 No_Module FC (No POD License) Disabled
sw0:admin> portcfgpersistentenable 19
sw0:admin> portcfgpersistentenable 23
sw0:admin> date
Tue Oct 25 04:03:42 UTC 2016
sw0:admin>
And still after 30 minutes, there is no failure. This run includes the
fix you asked me to ass
(https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/527268df31e57cf2b6d417198717c6d6afdb1e3e)
. If everything works, I will revert the patch and see if I can
reproduce the issue. If I can reproduce it, then the disk might not
have been it, but the patch was. I'll keep you posted on that when I
get a new disk tomorrow.
Right now this is a POC setup so I have lots of room to experiment.
Hey Nicholas,
I've done some testing up till now. With or without the patch above, as
long as the faulty disk is removed from the RAID 6 software array,
everything works fine with the Target Driver and ESXi hosts. This is
even on a degraded array:
[root@mbpc-pc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sdc[1] sda[5] sdd[3] sde[8] sdb[7]
3907045632 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/5]
[UUUU_U]
bitmap: 6/8 pages [24KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
[root@mbpc-pc ~]#
So at the moment, the data points to the single failed single disk (
/dev/sdf ) as causing the Target Drivers or QLogic cards to throw an
exception.
Tomorrow I will insert the failed disk back in to see if the a) array
takes it back, b) it causes a failure with the patch applied.
Looks like the failed disk /dev/sdf was limping along for months and
until I removed the power, it didn't collapse on itself.
--
Cheers,
Tom K.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
