Re: [PATCH 13/24] libfc: safeguard against invalid exchange index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/13/2016 06:10 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
The cached exchange index might be invalid, in which case
we should drop down to allocate a new one.
And we should not try to access an invalid exchange when
responding to a BA_ABTS.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux