[PATCH 12/12] scsi/ncr5380: Suppress unhelpful "interrupt without IRQ bit" message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If a NCR5380 host instance ends up on a shared interrupt line then
this printk will be a problem. It is already a problem on some Mac
models: when testing mac_scsi on a PowerBook 180 I found that PDMA
transfers (but not PIO transfers) cause the message to be logged.

These spurious interrupts don't appear to come from the DRQ signal from
the 5380. And they don't happen at all on the Mac LC III. A comment in
the NetBSD source code mentions this mystery. Testing seems to show
that we can safely ignore these interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
index d479e11..03d3d1b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __maybe_unused NCR5380_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		}
 		handled = 1;
 	} else {
-		shost_printk(KERN_NOTICE, instance, "interrupt without IRQ bit\n");
+		dsprintk(NDEBUG_INTR, instance, "interrupt without IRQ bit\n");
 #ifdef SUN3_SCSI_VME
 		dregs->csr |= CSR_DMA_ENABLE;
 #endif
-- 
2.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux