On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:30 -0700, Alexis Bruemmer wrote: > sas: phy0 added to port0, phy_mask:0x1 > [ 155.328494] sas: phy1 matched wide port0 > [ 155.328499] sas: phy1 added to port0, phy_mask:0x3 > [ 155.328516] sas: phy2 matched wide port0 > [ 155.328520] sas: phy2 added to port0, phy_mask:0x7 > [ 155.328541] sas: phy3 matched wide port0 > [ 155.328548] sas: phy3 added to port0, phy_mask:0xf > [ 155.328578] sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 0, pid:1785 > [ 155.328917] sas: ex 5005076a00000a40 phy00:T attached: > 50010b9000021585 > [ 155.328996] sas: ex 5005076a00000a40 phy01:T attached: > 50010b9000021575 > [ 155.329081] sas: ex 5005076a00000a40 phy02:T attached: > 50010b900004b87e > [ 155.329169] sas: ex 5005076a00000a40 phy03:S attached: > 5005076a011061c0 No. Look again. the first four, which are a wide port, are phys 0-3 on the HBA. The second four, which have separate attached devices are phys 0-3 on the expander (that's what the sightly cryptic ex 5005076a00000a40 phy<n> means). You can see this better in the transport class tree James - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
