On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 22:55 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as > drivers > are loaded. I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be > on a bus. The only example I have of devices not-on-a-bus are scsi > targets. I would propose introducing a new scsi_target bus for them, > then removing the 'target' from the start of the bus_id. Adding them > to > the scsi bus looks like it'd be a lot of work. It's not just the target. All the intermediate devices in transport classes don't have busses either. The only reason scsi_device has a bus is so we can use the driver model to bind the ULDs. James - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
