Dear Mark,
Thank you.
I appreciate your quick response.
Best Regards
Hiroomi Sakurai
"Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree, the math for underflow is flawed for block sizes other than
> 512, but I leave it up to the community to decide if there is some
> history behind this decision. This math has remained this way 'forever'.
>
> The dpt_i2o driver should have the following (and more accurately
> enclosed) patch to match up with what other sections of code in this
> driver are doing with regards to the underflow check. Other drivers all
> appear to be performing the underflow check in this manner.
>
> len = cmd->request_bufflen;
>
> - if(cmd->underflow && len != cmd->underflow){
> + if(cmd->underflow && len < cmd->underflow){
> printk(KERN_WARNING"Cmd len %08X Cmd underflow %08X\n",
> len, cmd->underflow);
> }
>
> Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
