On Wed, May 10 2006, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 12:41 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > Looks good. There is no proposed change to sg.c . > > Could SG_FLAG_FAILFAST be made to work via sg device > > nodes? > > Rather than having to maintain two separate paths for SG_IO and hence > keep running into this issue, what will it take for sg to use the block > scsi_ioctl.c? The plan still remains to use bsg to consolidate the two. -- Jens Axboe - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
