Re: [PATCH] Retry INQUIRY on power-on

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hannes Reinecke wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 15:12 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
So we really should loosen that statement to do retry for all ASC 0x29
values as a power-on might well have occured without a reset.
Actually, there's probably no reason to qualify the UNIT_ATTENTION at
all.  Any device that replies UNIT_ATTENTION to INQUIRY is out of spec,
so it's reasonable to assume that the ASC/ASCQ responses aren't in spec
either.  There doesn't seem to be a disadvantage to just retrying three
times in all unit attention cases.

Well, after looking through the trace I discovered it's not actually a
broken device, but rather more a driver issue:

- SCSI ML sends inquiry
- HBA cannot send message as transport parameters are invalid
- HBA requests sense
- HBA sets the sense code and returns command with code 'ADD_TO_MLQUEUE'
  to inform ML to retry the command

Only the ML fails to honour the ADD_TO_MLQUEUE code as this is
scsi_scan(), which doesn't check for it.
So if anything then rather the code in scsi_scan should been fixed to
retry the command if so advised from the LLD.


Normally, a request from the scsi scan code should go through scsi_softirq_done which checks for scsi_decide_disposition returning ADD_TO_MLQUEUE. Is aic7xxx setting the host byte to DID_REQUEUE?
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux