Re: [PATCH 1/3] Try LUN 1 and use bflags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:11:47PM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> @@ -945,11 +945,13 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(str
>  		sparse_lun = 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If not sparse lun and no device attached at LUN 0 do not scan
> -	 * any further.
> -	 */
> +	 * If LUN0 did respond, but did not have an attachable LUN (PQ=3),
> +	 * we do NOT abort the sequential scan yet, let's try one more
> +	 * LUN and only abort the scan if we don't find anything there.
> +	 * 
>  	if (!sparse_lun && (lun0_res != SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT))
>  		return;
> +	 */

Just delete all that, and get rid of lun0_res.

-- Patrick Mansfield
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux