Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: Add scsi_device max_cmd_len

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
>> This really doesn't look correct.  What you want is a sata transport
>> class with a max command length in the host device.
> 
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> this sounds wrong to me.  cdb length is a limitation of the host (driver).
>> A target will reject unknown commands, no matter what length they have.
> 
> 
> In practice, CDB length may be limited by both the host and the device. 
>   This applies to ATAPI, and some USB storage too IIRC.  For ATAPI, you 
> read the CDB length from the device's IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE info page.

So the question remains, do we need to police the CDB length on a per device
basis, or is a per host basis ok? Will we have ATAPI devices falling on the
floor if they get sent too large of a cdb?

Brian

-- 
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux