Luben Tuikov wrote: > Me, early Jan'06: Paper submitted. > Linuxsymposium, 16 Feb 2006 : Paper approved. > Linuxsymposium, date unknown: Silently moved to a BOF, I was never notified. > Me, 9 Mar 2006 : BOF rejected by me because last year I did held a SAS BOF. > Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : moved back to a paper. > Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : paper rejected. > > Serial Attached SCSI, An Architecture For Linux On the face of it, the Ottawa Linux Symposium has some explaining to do. This following quote is from: http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/cfp.php "Step 2 Committee Review" "The programme committee will review your proposal per the guidelines above. Notification of acceptance or rejection will be sent by February 15th, 2006." Luben, it looks like you failed at Step 2.5 (hidden): political correctness. Perhaps OLS approved another paper from a different author on a similar subject? For reference here is the OLS review committee who, it would seem, "approved" Luben's paper: Jeff Garzik, Red Hat Software Gerrit Huizenga, IBM Andrew Hutton, Steamballoon Incorporated Dave Jones, Red Hat Software Ben LaHaise, Intel Corporation Matt Mackall, Selenic Consulting Patrick Mochel, Intel Corporation Craig Ross, Linux Symposium Doug Gilbert - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
