Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:43:43PM -0500, James Smart wrote: > > It would have been nice to have had this response on the RFC. > > > > I'm actually looking into netlink for the CT pass thru, ELS and rnid > > functions. > > > > Does it make sense to move forward with some event support - namely > > the events attributes minus the kobject_uevent() stuff ? > > Actually the events attributes are what I don't like at all. kobject_uevent > already is a wrapper around netlink, it just doesn't allow to transport > all the nessecary data. > The scsi_transport_iscsi.c already contains the netlink infrastructure. Maybe some of this code could be shared between the transports. I derived another implementation off the iscsi transport code for dm that uses the netlink attribute support. https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2006-February/msg00024.html -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@xxxxxxxxxx - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
