Matthias Andree wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Douglas Gilbert wrote: >>Matthias Andree wrote: >>>Does this work around new incompatibilities in the kernel >>>or does this fix lsscsi bugs? >> >>The former. In lk 2.6.16-rc1 the >>/sys/class/scsi_device/<hcil>/device/block symlink >>changed to ".../block:sd<x>" breaking lsscsi 0.16 (and >>earlier) and sg_map26 (in sg3_utils). > > Heck, what was the reason for breaking userspace again? Maybe the person responsible can answer. I'm only reacting to a change that broke two of my utilities. > Why would someone even consider using sysfs at all if it changes > incompatibly? Indeed. Doug Gilbert - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
