Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > I think we can assume that it will be seen there. 2.6.16 is going into > > > distros and will have more exposure than 2.6.15, > > > > 2.6.15 went into distros as well, such as Fedora Core 4 ;) > > And promptly broke laptop suspension. See, for example: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180998 > That's suspend-to-disk, yes? Dave, would you have the 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 -> 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4 details handy? There surely can't be much difference? There seem to be several ACPI problems there. Do we have a reliable means of feeding such reports up into the (for example) acpi developers? <I have this vaguely unsettled feeling that distros must get more bug reports than the usptream developers, yet we hear so little about it> - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
