Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think we can assume that it will be seen there.  2.6.16 is going into
> > > distros and will have more exposure than 2.6.15, 
> > 
> > 2.6.15 went into distros as well, such as Fedora Core 4 ;)
> 
> And promptly broke laptop suspension.  See, for example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180998
> 

That's suspend-to-disk, yes?

Dave, would you have the 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 -> 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4 details
handy?  There surely can't be much difference?

There seem to be several ACPI problems there.  Do we have a reliable means
of feeding such reports up into the (for example) acpi developers?

<I have this vaguely unsettled feeling that distros must get more bug
reports than the usptream developers, yet we hear so little about it>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux