Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6052] New: Megaraid file corruption and performance degradation on x86_64 with 8G RAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Switching off the directio in megaraid's setup to cacheio should help.
It's controller's (32bit) problem not drivers.


On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:19:45 -0800
> From: bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: bugme-new@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6052] New: Megaraid file corruption and performance degradation on x86_64 with 8G RAM
> 
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6052
> 
>            Summary: Megaraid file corruption and performance degradation on
>                     x86_64 with 8G RAM
>     Kernel Version: 2.6.15-1.2005_FC4smp
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>              Owner: andmike@xxxxxxxxxx
>          Submitter: bloch@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur:
> Distribution: 
> Fedora Core 4
> 
> Hardware Environment: 
> 
> Tyan S2882
> 2 x Opteron 252
> 8G RAM
> LSI MegaRAID SATA 150-4
> 
> Software Environment:
> 
> Problem Description:
> 
> A RAID1 mirror was setup using the MegaRAID card and 2 x 250 GB drives.
> After only a day or so of use, there was severe filesystem corruption (using
> ext3) and the user complained that even before the corruption it was incredibly
> slow (the mirror is used to house $HOME).
> 
> We have other machines here with only 4G RAM using the same card and setup. 
> Performance there is fine and there's been no filesystem corruption.
> 
> In one case I removed the drives from the card and connected them to the SATA
> ports on the motherboard, using software RAID.  That machine is working fine.
> 
> In the other case I have tried using a Fedora test kernel, equivalent to
> 2.6.16-rc2, which has the latest version of the MegaRAID driver (2.20.4.7).
> I was unable to recover the filesystem on the original partition when running
> fsck using the new kernel.  However, at least on this occasion fsck kept running
> (for two days...) instead of crashing.
> 
> When running mkfs on the hardware RAID1 mirror, performance still seems to be
> very slow.
> 
> Hence it appears there is a specific problem with the LSI megaraid driver on
> x86_64 machines with more than 4G RAM.
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> -
> : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux