On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:27:21AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Do we need per-device blist flags at all? I suspect just having them in > > the target should be enough. > > Some of the blist flags clearly are per-device: BLIST_KEY, BLIST_ISROM, > BLIST_NOSTARTONADD, BLIST_MS_SKIP_PAGE_08, BLIST_MS_SKIP_PAGE_3F, > BLIST_USE_10_BYTE_MS, BLIST_MS_192_BYTES_FOR_3F, BLIST_NOT_LOCKABLE, > BLIST_NO_ULD_ATTACH, BLIST_RETRY_HWERROR. There are a few others I'm not > certain about. Why are these clearly per LUN? I agree some of them are debatable, but most of them indicate a general lack-of-scsi-spec compliance on the part of the manufacturer and hence apply to the piece of hardware (== scsi target) rather than just one of the LUNs in it. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
