James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 15:13 -0600, Brian King wrote: >> Any reason the other sg patch I submitted didn't get pushed? > > Er ... I didn't notice it go by and no-one told me? > >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113753907627483&w=2 >> >> I was hoping to see this one go into the rc fixes, since without >> it ipr's RAID configuration tools do not work. > > In theory, it only affects the sg path, the path via the ULD device node > should already be fixed, so any management tool could use the sd (or st > or sr) node instead ... you probably want to do that anyway to avoid > mapping issues between the sg and sd nodes. I already use the sd node when I can in ipr's RAID management tool, but for physical disks in RAID arrays and for the RAID adapter itself, only sg gets attached, so I have to use sg. Brian -- Brian King eServer Storage I/O IBM Linux Technology Center - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
