RE: [PATCH] add SPI transport class to fusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote: 

> > Yes ... it's the job of whoever is issuing passthrough I/O 
> to ensure the
> > RAID is quiesced (if they need it ... there are plenty of 
> commands that
> > could be usefully executed even with the RAID running), so 
> really, we
> > only need it for the DV because additional I/O could interfere with
> > that.
> > 

James:  I asked around about my quiesce-io concern this morning.  This 
particular concern can be dropped.   They agree with your
implementation,
whereas we only do this from dv.   Thanks...

Eric Moore
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux