On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:38:12AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 17:50 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > Are all sata drivers affected by this bug in 2.6.15? > > Well, all SCSI drivers are affected by it, yes. However, SATA devices > are peculiarly affected because the ordered_flush method of enforcing > barriers, which is where the leak is, can only be implemented for > devices that don't do tag command queueing (i.e. don't have multiple > commands outstanding for a given single device). By and large, SATA > drivers are the only drivers in the SCSI subsystem that can't do tag > command queueing, which is why the problem didn't show up for any other > type of SCSI driver. > OK.. thanks for summarizing this. > > Any 'official' patch available? > > Well, yes, 2.6.16-rc1 has this fixed. I can't see backporting this to > 2.6.15.x since it represents a significant functionality enhancement as > well, so I'd lean towards just forcing ordered_flush to zero in 2.6.15.x > which seems to be the best bug fix. > OK. > > Or is the recommended workaround to set ordered_flush to 0 to fix this.. > > does that have any downsides? > > setting ordered_flush to zero for 2.6.15 turns off the flushing > functionality and restores the old behaviour. I don't see that there > would be any down side to this. > That's good to hear. Thanks. -- Pasi - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html