James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:06 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
It does not have anything to do with this in scsi_io_completion does it?
if (blk_complete_barrier_rq(q, req, good_bytes >> 9))
return;
For that case the scsi_cmnd does not get freed. Does it come back around
again and get released from a different path?
It looks such a likely candidate, doesn't it. Unfortunately, Tejun Heo
removed that code around 6 Jan (in [BLOCK] update SCSI to use new
blk_ordered for barriers), so if it is that, then the latest kernels
should now not be leaking.
Oh, I thought the reports were for 2.6.15 and below which has that
scsi_io_completion test. Have there been reports for this with
2.6.16-rc1 too?
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
