Re: SCSI tape access on 2.6 kernels?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Chip Coldwell wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Chip Coldwell wrote:
> >
> > > Put
> > >
> > > options st try_direct_io=0
> >
> > >
> > > in /etc/modprobe.conf.  Direct I/O defeats read-ahead, and
> > > significantly (factor of >5) degrates read performance.  I don't know
> > > about writes.
> >
> > For tape???
> 
> Yes, for tape.  We verified this with a DAT72 DDS drive.
> 
How did you do the tests? I would like to be able to reproduce this 
finding because there is something wrong somewhere. With any decent read() 
and write() byte counts (the 64 kB you mention in another message is 
decent) you should not find direct i/o slower than using the driver 
buffer. I have not seen anything like this with my DDS-4 drive (same 
speed as DAT72).

-- 
Kai
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux