On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > - udelay(10); /* v4.27 */ > > + msleep(10); > > this goes from a 10 microsecond delay to a 10 milisecond delay. Was that > intentional? the original (original) code was: ... set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); schedule_timeout(10); during upstream development it was changed (incorrectly) to: udelay(10); again, the qla2xxx driver only uses this poll-for-completion mechanism during init-time. There really is (was) no reason to bang on the chip in such a tight-loop. Thanks, Andrew - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
