Gerhard Schneider wrote:
Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
(0,1) 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256
RHEL4U2 23.8 46.8 87.8 89.6 89.5 89.6 89.5 89.5 89.5
2.6.14 3.9 7.8 15.6 31.2 62.5 89.6 89.5 89.5 89.6
Differ -83.6% -83.3% -82.2% -65.2% -30.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
(0,1) means target 1 on bus 0, and then the columns represent different
transfer sizes (1K up to 256K). I also see some that show little if any
difference:
(6,4) 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256
RHEL4U2 23.9 46.9 88.5 90.0 89.9 89.9 89.9 90.0 89.9
2.6.14.2 24.1 47.0 88.5 90.0 89.9 90.0 89.9 89.9 89.9
Differ 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0%
Did you apply [PATCH] mptfusion : dv performance fix by
Eric Dean Moore? (Dec. 1st, 2005) W/o that patch the first four disks of
an 1030 are performing 3.5 MB/s instead of 70 :-)
It was funny how slow a RAID 5-0 can be when four of fourteen disks
are slow...
GS
I do not know how to grab that specific patch, but I am just trying a
2.6.15-rc6 kernel, and things seem much better. I'm hoping that
2.6.15-rc6 contains the patch you mention?
Thanks,
Alan
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
