On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 12:46 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > > > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > > > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". > > > > The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude', > > which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi > > directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct > > replies. > > This is the post I object to: > [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113404894931377&w=2] I would imagine, and that is what I'm explaining to you. Can we please just let this die? Thanks. -- Jens Axboe - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
