On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". > > The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude', > which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi > directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct > replies. I was just following the example set by the ide acpi suspend/resume patch, which people didn't seem to object to nearly as much. I guess IDE's such a hack anyway that people aren't as worried :) I'll try produce a patch that just inserts platform-independent code into scsi around the start of next week. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
