RE: [PATCH 9/11][REPOST #2] lpfc 8.1.1 : Add polled-mode support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ok fair enough...  what kind of granularity can this delay be set too?
> It might make sense to default to say 50 usec or 100usec always...

Range is in milliseconds, and capped to a value < 100ms.

We had the same thoughts. In general we concluded that the lost cycles in
queuecommand probably still outweighs the gain. This, coupled with the
general hesitancy to change the base behavior w/o a compelling reason,
(and the qual impacts) means we have no desire to change the default.
 
> Also, not sure how your hardware works but it would be really sweet if
> the kernel could set "this request should be coalesed" or 
> "this request
> is latency sensitive, gimme immediate", so that we can set async write
> IO's for coalescing while not getting latency on reads...

Yep. Unfortunately, nothing this granular.

-- james
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux