Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] writes: > NACK on the write filter. If we can agree on it beeing > useful (and I must > admit I tend to the contrary opinion) it should be done in > higher layers. Our customers won't stand still if we do not write (and read) protect the raid components. So you propose the introduction of an sdev->io_protect flag? > Also why do we need the !sdev->no_uld_attach && !sdev->channel checks? This is additional insurance, the fact that channel 0 is the array channel. We do not want the no_uld_attach to be part of the array channel. -- Mark Salyzyn - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html