RE: [PATCH 1/5] aacraid: simplify non-dasd support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] writes:
> NACK on the write filter.  If we can agree on it beeing 
> useful (and I must
> admit I tend to the contrary opinion) it should be done in 
> higher layers.

Our customers won't stand still if we do not write (and read) protect
the raid components. So you propose the introduction of an
sdev->io_protect flag?

> Also why do we need the !sdev->no_uld_attach && !sdev->channel checks?

This is additional insurance, the fact that channel 0 is the array
channel. We do not want the no_uld_attach to be part of the array
channel.

-- Mark Salyzyn
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux