On Wed, Nov 30 2005, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:08 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Oh well, so much for expecting than even the most basic SCSI behaviour > > is always implemented correctly. A device must only return > > 0x05/0x20/0x00 for an illegal opcode. It's a little suspicious I'd say, > > are you sure it isn't something else affecting this? Even though there > > are crappy devices out there, this seems a little too odd to me. > > And anyway, just because it doesn't actually work in the failing case > doesn't mean this isn't a good patch ... it's certainly unsafe to switch > back to 6 byte commands without checking for the correct illegal opcode > sense, so we should put it in anyway. Yup, I think so too. -- Jens Axboe - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
