Re: [PATCH 6/11] lpfc 8.1.1 : Fixes to error handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>So you this storage vendor please provide us this test case 
>>as a start?
> 
> 
> Basic test case:
>  - start load on the fc disks
>  - run sg_reset -b /dev/sgX or sg_reset -d /dev/sgX
> 
> 
>>That beeing said I mentioned that we need to do SG-based 
>>resets via the
>>EH thread aswell.  As Emulex apparently cares about the above 
>>case would
>>you mind implementing it?
> 
> 
> Well - we would prefer the vendor test the system as it should behave
> in normal circumstances rather than test-suite-derived conditions.
> 
> Yes, we will sign up for this. However, we have several items on our
> plate so we won't be on this quickly. I would hope there would be no
> issue with accepting the patch as is and backing out the relatived code
> as part of the eventual patch.  We'll also be contacting the SG maintainer
> to get his/her thoughts.

While on the subject of resets, linux still has a
fuzziness around a "device" reset. There should be
two resets around this level:
  - target reset: reset a target device, its ports and
    all logical units within it [transport level]
  - logical unit reset: reset a logical unit only
    [this is a mandatory SCSI task management function]

If changes are being made in this area, then perhaps
this fuzziness should be addressed.

Doug Gilbert

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux