Re: [PATCH 6/11] lpfc 8.1.1 : Fixes to error handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:08:56PM -0500, James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This is true - when invoked via the error handler thread.  Unfortunately,
> reset functions invoked via SG do not have the same behavior. There is a
> rather large test suite from a big storage vendor that uses asynchronous
> resets via SG extensively.

So you this storage vendor please provide us this test case as a start?

That beeing said I mentioned that we need to do SG-based resets via the
EH thread aswell.  As Emulex apparently cares about the above case would
you mind implementing it?

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux